Your Federal Employee Rights Amid Recent Executive Actions

MSPB Settlement Amounts: What to Expect in Your Federal Case

Attorney Justin Schnitzer

Written by: Attorney Justin Schnitzer


Experts In This Article

Standing at the crossroads of an MSPB appeal, you’re faced with difficult choices that could substantially impact your career and financial future. As a federal employee challenging an adverse employment action, you might be wondering whether to pursue your case through a full hearing or consider settlement—and if settlement is your preferred path, what kind of compensation you might reasonably expect. Understanding typical settlement values, including MSPB settlement amounts, allows you to approach negotiations with realistic expectations and make informed decisions about your case.

What Are Typical MSPB Settlement Amounts?

MSPB settlement amounts vary widely, often ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $100,000, depending on case strength, back pay exposure, and other factors, but there is no official published data confirming a typical range. Cases with strong evidence of wrongdoing or those involving considerable back pay may exceed these figures, while weak cases might settle for less than $5,000.

Understanding the MSPB Appeal Process

The Merit Systems Protection Board serves as an independent, quasi-judicial agency designed to protect federal merit systems and your rights as a federal employee. Its jurisdiction covers many adverse employment actions that might impact your career, including:

  • Removals (terminations)
  • Suspensions exceeding 14 days
  • Reductions in grade or pay
  • Furloughs of 30 days or less
  • Certain performance-based actions
  • Denials of within-grade increases
  • Whistleblower retaliation claims

If you’re facing one of these actions, you typically have 30 days to file an MSPB appeal. Once filed, an administrative judge (AJ) is assigned to your case and issues acknowledgment and jurisdiction orders. Should your case proceed, both sides engage in discovery—a process that often clarifies the relative strengths of each party’s position.

Settlement discussions can occur at any point during this process. Many administrative judges actively facilitate these discussions, recognizing that mutually acceptable resolutions often benefit both parties more than extended litigation. Settlement is entirely voluntary and can happen with or without the judge’s involvement.

Related Read: How to Win an MSPB Appeal: Key Steps and Timeline

Factors That Influence Your Settlement Value

  1. Strength of evidence: When you have clear documentation of agency wrongdoing, you can typically negotiate higher settlements than in cases with ambiguous evidence.
  2. Nature of the adverse action: Removals generally command higher settlements than suspensions, reflecting the greater financial impact of losing your position entirely.
  3. Your salary level: If you’re a higher-paid employee, you can often secure larger settlements because back pay calculations—a foundation of many settlements—are directly tied to your salary.
  4. Length of service: As a long-term employee, you may secure better settlements due to your demonstrated value and potentially stronger due process claims.
  5. Back pay exposure: The longer your case has been pending, the more back pay potentially at stake, which can increase your settlement value.
  6. Litigation risk: When the agency perceives a high risk of losing at hearing, they’re typically more motivated to offer a substantial settlement.
  7. Compensatory damages potential: In cases involving discrimination or whistleblower retaliation, the potential for compensatory damages can substantially increase settlement values.
  8. Agency resources and policies: Some agencies have more flexible settlement authority or greater financial resources than others, affecting what they can offer.

Components of MSPB Settlements

Monetary Components

  • Back pay: You may receive compensation for wages lost from the adverse action date to the settlement date, often with interest.
  • Front pay: Instead of reinstatement, you might receive payment for future lost wages.
  • Compensatory damages: In mixed cases involving discrimination claims, you could receive compensation for emotional distress, reputation damage, and other non-economic harms.
  • Attorney’s fees: The settlement may cover some or all of your legal representation costs.

Non-Monetary Components

  • Reinstatement: You might return to the same or a comparable position.
  • Clean record agreement: Negative information can be removed from your personnel files.
  • Neutral reference: The agency may agree to provide neutral employment references.
  • Leave restoration: Annual or sick leave used during the dispute period may be reinstated.
  • Performance evaluation modifications: Negative evaluations might be changed to positive or neutral ratings.
  • Resignation option: You may be allowed to resign rather than being terminated.
  • Confidentiality provisions: Both parties might agree not to discuss settlement terms.

Typical Settlement Ranges by Case Type

  • Wrongful Termination: Wrongful termination cases can result in some of the highest MSPB settlements, especially when significant back pay or discrimination claims are involved, but specific ranges vary widely and are not officially published.
  • Suspensions: Suspension cases generally result in lower settlements than removals, with amounts varying based on the length of suspension and case strength.
  • Demotion Cases: Demotion cases may include monetary compensation and restoration of grade or step, but settlement amounts vary and are not officially published.
  • Whistleblower Retaliation: These cases can result in substantial settlements, sometimes exceeding $100,000, particularly with strong evidence of retaliation for protected disclosures.
  • Performance-Based Actions: Performance-based action settlements often include non-monetary terms such as evaluation modifications and clean record provisions, with monetary amounts varying widely.
  • Constructive Discharge Claims: Constructive discharge settlements vary widely and depend on the quality of evidence and case specifics.

Balancing Monetary and Non-Monetary Terms

When evaluating a settlement offer, consider both the immediate financial benefit and the long-term career impact of non-monetary terms. Sometimes, what doesn’t appear on the check can prove more valuable to your future. A clean employment record preserves your ability to secure future federal employment. Neutral reference agreements protect your professional reputation with potential employers. The option to resign instead of being terminated eliminates the need to explain a removal on future job applications.

You should also consider tax implications of different settlement structures. Back pay is typically taxable as wages, while compensatory damages for physical injuries or sickness may be tax-exempt. How settlement payments are characterized in the agreement can considerably impact your net recovery.

Non-monetary terms often cost the agency little while providing substantial value to you. For example, an agency may readily agree to remove negative performance evaluations or provide a neutral reference—terms that require minimal expenditure from them but may dramatically improve your future employment prospects.

Negotiation Strategies to Maximize Your Settlement

Timing plays an important role in settlement negotiations. Early discussions may yield modest results since neither party has fully assessed the case’s strengths and weaknesses. Conversely, waiting until just before the hearing increases pressure on both sides to settle but leaves little time for thoughtful negotiation.

To effectively negotiate your settlement:

  1. Gather comprehensive documentation supporting your claims, including emails, performance reviews, and witness statements.
  2. Realistically assess your case’s strengths and weaknesses, and calculate potential back pay and damages.
  3. Develop several acceptable settlement scenarios rather than fixating on a single outcome.
  4. Understand agency constraints that may affect what they can offer, including budgetary, regulatory, or policy limitations.
  5. Exercise patience, as settlement negotiations often involve multiple rounds of offers and counteroffers.

Be prepared for standard negotiation tactics from agencies, such as claims of limited settlement authority or artificial deadlines. Understanding these tactics helps you respond effectively rather than accepting an inadequate offer out of pressure or fear.

The Value of Legal Representation

For personalized guidance throughout your case, consulting an experienced MSPB lawyer can be invaluable.

While representing yourself in an MSPB case is possible, professional legal representation often results in substantially higher settlements. Experienced attorneys bring:

  1. Objective case valuation based on precedent and similar cases.
  2. Negotiation expertise and understanding of agency tactics.
  3. Procedural knowledge to navigate complex MSPB procedures and deadlines.
  4. Strategic documentation approaches that strengthen your position.

Most MSPB attorney work on contingency fees (typically 25-40% of recovery) or hourly rates. In successful cases, attorney’s fees may be recoverable as part of the settlement. When evaluating whether to hire an attorney, consider not just their fee but the potential increase in settlement value they might secure for you.

Current Trends Affecting MSPB Settlements

  • Board Quorum Issues: Periodic lack of quorum has created case backlogs, sometimes incentivizing agencies to settle rather than face extended uncertainty.
  • Remote Work Considerations: Post-pandemic workplace changes have introduced new issues in reasonable accommodation and performance evaluation cases.
  • Administration Policies: Changes in federal workforce policies between administrations can affect agency willingness to litigate or settle.
  • Whistleblower Protections: Enhanced protections have increased potential remedies in retaliation cases, potentially raising settlement values.
  • Budget Constraints: Agency budget limitations may influence settlement authority, with some agencies preferring non-monetary terms over large cash payments.

These trends continue to develop with changing political and economic conditions. Staying informed about current developments can give you an advantage when negotiating your settlement.

While MSPB settlements vary widely based on individual circumstances, understanding typical components and ranges provides valuable perspective as you navigate your case. Whether you’re seeking reinstatement, compensation, or a clean record, this knowledge helps you evaluate offers and make decisions that best serve your professional future.

Do You Need Legal Help?

At The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer, we specialize in federal employment law services for federal employees across the country.

Whether you are facing disciplinary action, discrimination, retaliation, or other employment-related issues, our federal employment attorneys are here to provide the legal support and guidance you need. Contact us today or call 202-964-4878 to schedule your initial consultation and learn more about how we can help you with your federal employment law matter.

Attorney Justin Schnitzer

Meet the Author:
Attorney Justin Schnitzer

Justin Schnitzer is the managing partner of The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer, and represents individual federal employees and unions in various aspects of federal employment law. His practice is primarily dedicated to federal EEOC and MSPB matters, responses to proposed disciplinary actions and investigations into potential misconduct.