Chances are you Googled “EEOC attorneys for federal employees” and were bombarded with countless results of law firms. To help narrow down your search, we have compiled a comprehensive list of some of the best EEOC attorneys for federal employees in America who have a proven track record of winning cases.
If you are a federal employee who has been targeted (or witnessed) an EEOC violation, it can be overwhelming to navigate the legal process. Selecting the best EEOC attorney to represent you can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.
Call Us For a Federal EEOC Consultation
Or, complete our short contact form
Why am I doing this?
I am willing to put that aside in the interest of helping federal employees find the best representation for their case. I recognize that choosing the right attorney for your EEOC case as a federal employee is crucial, and I want to ensure you receive top-notch representation.
EEOC issues for federal employees can have significant consequences, impacting your career and livelihood. Having the best legal support is essential to navigate through these challenges successfully.
I want you to have the highest probability of receiving the best outcome possible in your EEOC case.
In addition, I have been practicing law for over a decade and my practice is primarily dedicated to federal EEOC and MSPB matters, responses to proposed disciplinary actions and investigations into potential misconduct.
Simply put, I am more qualified than these directories to guide you in finding the right attorney.
While I would strongly encourage you to reach out to my law firm first, I understand the importance of exploring all options. My objective is to equip you with the information needed to make an informed decision about your legal representation.
Here are 6 of the best EEOC attorneys for federal employees in 2026:
6 of the Best EEOC Attorneys for Federal Employees in 2026
- Justin Schnitzer – The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer
- Eric Pines – Pines Federal
- Aaron Wersing – Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC
- Bobby Devadoss – The Devadoss Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
- Benjamin Wick – The Wick Law Office
- Elizabeth Matta – The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer
The Pay-to-Play Problem with “Best Attorney” Lists
Before you got to this article, Google showed you four sponsored ads. The lineup shifts depending on who is bidding hardest that day, but it usually includes a few of the same firms. Some of them genuinely practice federal employment law. At least one of them is probably an employment law firm that represents private sector employees only. Another is a generic-sounding site that does not name a single attorney on its homepage.
What you need to understand is that these positions are paid for, bidded on and have no reflection of the quality of work that these law firms offer.
They tell you one thing: those law firms wrote checks to Google to sit above the organic search results. The federal employee whose career is on the line scrolls past four ads before reaching anyone Google’s algorithm thinks is genuinely relevant to the search. That is the modern version of pay-to-play.
The older version still exists too. Justia, Avvo, Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, Expertise, Three Best Rated. These attorney directories sell badge placements and “Top 10” listings to whoever pays the most. The criteria is not skill, outcomes, or client results. It is whether the firm bought the spot.
That is why this article exists. Nobody paid me to put the names below on this list. I cannot be paid to put a name on this list. The six attorneys I am about to recommend are the ones I have watched do the work. Some of them are direct competitors of mine. I would still send my own family to any of them.
I. Justin Schnitzer – EEOC Attorney at The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer
I will start with my own firm. Not because I am the best, but because you deserve to know who I am before I ask you to take my word on anyone else on this list.
I built my practice specifically to represent federal employees in EEO and MSPB matters. Over the past decade, I have represented federal workers across nearly every federal agency in discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, reasonable accommodation, and mixed-case appeals. The work is what I do. It is not a sideline to a larger practice.
What I hear from clients most often is that they felt like I was actually in their corner. Every client gets my cell phone number. The federal EEO process can drag on for years, and the difference between a firm that returns your call within the hour and one that takes a week is not small. It is the difference between a client who sleeps at night and one who does not.
When you are a federal employee up against your own agency and its team of lawyers, you need an attorney who is going to fight. That is what I do.
II. Eric Pines – Pines Federal
Eric Pines is widely regarded as one of the most experienced federal employment attorneys in the country. He has been doing this work for a long time and has built Pines Federal into a firm that operates at scale while keeping a deep focus on the federal sector.
Eric began his career as in-house counsel for AFGE Local 1923 at the Social Security Administration’s headquarters. That background matters. He learned the federal sector from the inside, sitting across the table from agency management and union officials, before moving to private practice on the employee side. Pines Federal has also built a serious library of educational resources, including a video library and podcast that cover federal employment issues in real depth. Firms that invest in educating clients are usually serious about the work.
If your case is complex, multi-jurisdictional, or involves a federal agency where Pines Federal has prior experience, Eric’s firm is a strong call.
III. Aaron Wersing – Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing
Aaron Wersing is a tenacious advocate with practical command of the federal EEO and MSPB process. He is not splitting time between private-sector employment disputes and federal matters. He is in this world full time.
Aaron handles a wide range of federal employment cases, including EEOC complaints, MSPB appeals, whistleblower retaliation, and federal disability retirement. His clients span across most federal agencies, and he is well-versed in the procedural and substantive issues that come up in adverse-action cases that overlap with discrimination claims.
What I respect about Aaron is that he understands the federal sector at a practical level. He knows how the EEOC and MSPB actually work, not just how the rules read on paper. That experience is hard to find and invaluable when your career is on the line.
IV. Bobby Devadoss – The Devadoss Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Bobby Devadoss has built one of the most established federal sector practices in the country. The Devadoss Law Firm has represented federal employees across virtually every agency, with a particular strength in adverse actions, EEO complaints, security clearance matters, and disciplinary defense.
Bobby is known for the seriousness with which he takes a case. He is not a high-volume operation that runs cases through a template. He approaches each matter individually, which is what federal employees facing termination or formal discipline actually need.
If your case involves a removal proposal tied to discrimination claims, or a complex EEO matter that has been mishandled at the agency level, Bobby’s firm is one I would recommend without hesitation.
V. Benjamin Wick – The Wick Law Office
Benjamin Wick has built a quieter practice than some of the other names on this list, but the federal employees who have worked with him know the quality of the representation. Ben focuses on federal sector EEO matters, MSPB appeals, and federal disability retirement.
What stands out about Ben is his attention to the procedural detail that wins federal cases. The federal EEO process has dozens of points where a missed deadline or a poorly framed claim can sink an otherwise strong case. Ben does not miss those things. He prepares cases the way a federal sector specialist should: methodically, with full awareness of the regulations and case law that govern each step.
For federal employees who want a steady hand and a clear strategy, Ben’s office is a place to start.
VI. Elizabeth Matta – EEOC Attorney at The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer
*Disclosure: Elizabeth is an associate at my firm. I am including her on this list because excluding someone I work with daily, and watch outperform attorneys at firms three times our size, would be its own form of dishonesty. Read her entry, then decide.*
Elizabeth Matta is the attorney clients ask for by name after a referral. That is not marketing copy. It is what actually happens at our firm. Federal employees who work with her once tell their colleagues, and the colleagues come in asking specifically for Elizabeth.
She came to federal employment law from unemployment and housing law. That background gives her something most federal employment attorneys do not have: a working understanding of what happens to a federal employee’s life when their job is in jeopardy. The income, the security clearance, the housing, the family. She sees the case as a person, not as a docket number.
What sets Elizabeth apart is her settlement work. She resolves cases on terms clients did not believe were on the table. She is exceptionally responsive: clients hear back the same day, not the next week. And her depth on adverse actions and discrimination claims is the kind that comes from living inside the regulations, not skimming them.
If you are a federal employee facing a discrimination claim, an adverse action, or both, ask for Elizabeth specifically.
(For the record, I am a close second on this one.)
What to Look for in a Federal EEOC Attorney
Not every attorney who advertises EEOC representation actually understands how the federal sector process works. Before you sign with anyone, check for these things.
Federal-sector specialization, not general employment. General employment lawyers handle private-sector discrimination, wage claims, and wrongful termination under state law. The federal EEO process is a different animal. The 45-day counselor contact rule, the formal complaint and investigation framework, the right to request a final agency decision or a hearing before an EEOC administrative judge, the appeal path to OFO, the option to file in federal district court. All of it is specific to federal employees. If your attorney has to ask what OFO stands for, find someone else.
MSPB familiarity. Many federal sector cases involve overlapping EEOC and MSPB jurisdiction. If your discrimination claim is tied to a removal, suspension, or other adverse personnel action, you may have a “mixed case” that gets adjudicated differently. An attorney who only handles EEOC and does not understand MSPB will miss procedural strategy that could change your outcome.
Agency-specific experience. Different federal agencies handle EEO cases differently. The Department of Veterans Affairs, the Postal Service, the Department of Defense, and the Transportation Security Administration each have their own internal EEO offices, their own patterns, and their own settlement tendencies. Ask whether the attorney has handled cases against your specific agency.
Settlement track record. Most federal EEO cases settle before they ever reach a hearing. The skill that matters most is not courtroom drama. It is the ability to negotiate a settlement that actually protects your career, your record, and your retirement. Ask what kinds of settlements the attorney has secured for cases similar to yours.
Direct attorney access. At some firms, you talk to a name partner during intake and then get handed off to a junior associate or paralegal. That may work for simple matters. EEO cases are rarely simple. If direct attorney access matters to you, ask the question before you sign the engagement letter.
Fee transparency. Federal employment attorneys charge in different ways. Hourly, flat fee, contingency on certain components, or hybrid arrangements. There is no single right answer, but there is one wrong answer: a firm that will not give you a clear written explanation of how you will be billed. Walk away from that.
Do You Need to Hire a Federal EEOC Attorney “Near Me”?
You don’t have to choose a federal EEOC attorney “near me” if you’re dealing with work problems. Just find the best lawyer with experience in cases like yours, even if they’re not nearby.
You’re free to work with the top federal EEOC attorneys, no matter where they’re based. Be sure to look at their track record, client reviews, and success rate before making a decision.
For legal representation in a federal EEOC case, choose The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer. With extensive experience in discrimination cases, our committed team fights for clients’ rights. Contact us at (202) 759-7795 for a consultation. Distance shouldn’t restrict your options for the best EEOC attorney.
Speak with a Federal EEOC Attorney Today
At The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer, we know that discrimination of any type is intolerable in the workplace. Federal offices should be exemplary in upholding federal labor laws, not exceptions to those laws. The federal employment lawyers at The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer are dedicated to providing personalized, high-quality legal representation to federal employees nationwide. Contact us today or call 202-759-7795 to schedule your initial consultation and learn more about how we can help you achieve your legal goals.
Federal EEOC Attorney FAQ
How is a federal EEOC complaint different from a private-sector one?
The federal sector EEO process is governed by 29 CFR Part 1614 and runs through the EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations. Private-sector charges go through the EEOC’s state and local offices and ultimately into federal district court if not resolved. The federal sector process has a mandatory pre-complaint counseling phase, a formal complaint phase handled internally by the agency, and an option to either request a final agency decision or a hearing before an EEOC administrative judge. The deadlines are shorter and the procedural rules are different.
How long do I have to file an EEO complaint as a federal employee?
You have 45 calendar days from the date of the discriminatory act, or from the date you reasonably should have known about it, to contact an EEO counselor at your agency. This is a hard deadline. Miss it and your claim is almost certainly dead. Counseling triggers the formal process, after which the standard timelines for filing a formal complaint, completing investigation, and electing your next step apply.
Do federal employment attorneys work on contingency?
Most do not. Federal sector EEO and MSPB cases rarely produce the kind of monetary damages that support a pure contingency arrangement. Most federal employment attorneys charge hourly, by flat fee for specific stages of a case, or in a hybrid structure. Some recover attorneys’ fees from the agency at the end of a successful case, which can offset what you have paid. Always ask for a written fee agreement before you sign.
What is the difference between EEOC and MSPB jurisdiction?
The EEOC handles discrimination, retaliation, and reasonable accommodation claims. The MSPB handles adverse personnel actions: removals, suspensions of more than 14 days, demotions, and similar discipline. Cases that involve both, for example a termination based partly on discrimination, are called “mixed cases” and have their own procedural framework. The election you make at the start of a mixed case can shape the entire outcome. This is one of the most common areas where federal employees lose ground because their attorney did not understand the rules.
Can I represent myself in a federal EEO case?
You can. Many federal employees handle the early counseling phase and even the formal complaint without an attorney. That said, agencies are represented by experienced agency counsel from the start, and the procedural complexity increases sharply if your case proceeds to a hearing or appeal. The earlier you bring in qualified counsel, the better positioned you are. Many federal employment attorneys offer paid consultations specifically to help you decide whether you need full representation.w that discrimination of any type is intolerable in the workplace. Federal offices should be exemplary in upholding federal labor laws, not exceptions to those laws. The federal employment lawyers at The Law Office of Justin Schnitzer are dedicated to providing personalized, high-quality legal representation to federal employees nationwide. Contact us today or call 202-964-4878 to schedule your initial consultation and learn more about how we can help you achieve your legal goals.